Back to Battle Cards
How SpartanX compares
SpartanX vs Hadrian
Learn how SpartanX covers the full stack while Hadrian focuses on external surfaces only
Feature by feature
Where SpartanX and Hadrian differ.
| Category | SpartanX | Hadrian |
|---|---|---|
| Core Vision | Agentic AI Security Workforce, autonomous agents that Defend (remediation) and Attack (red-teaming) across the full stack. | Agentic EASM, AI continuously discovers and validates external attack surface exposures 24/7. |
| Mission Focus | Full lifecycle: discover → validate → prioritize → fix → simulate attacks → report. | External-facing: discover all assets an attacker can see, validate exploitability, prioritize by risk. |
| Scope of Coverage | Code → Infra → Cloud → APIs → LLMs → Continuous Red-Team. | External attack surface only, domains, subdomains, exposed services, cloud misconfigs, infostealers. |
| Automation Level | Multi-agent AI orchestration, autonomous workflows from discovery to auto-fix. | Autonomous AI discovery and validation of external exposures; no remediation automation. |
| Remediation Capability | Auto-generates code fixes + Pull Requests into developer repos. | No remediation, delivers prioritized findings for security teams to act on. |
| Offensive Security | Continuous 24/7 AI Red-Team integrated with defensive analytics. | NOVA agentic pentest product, external attack surface validation at pentest depth. |
| Internal / Code Coverage | Full code-level SAST, DAST, SCA, and developer workflow integration. | External only, no internal visibility, no code review, no CI/CD integration. |
| Knowledge Intelligence | Ontology-driven Knowledge Graph linking vulns ⇔ MITRE ATT&CK ⇔ business impact ⇔ compliance. | Attack surface graph for external asset correlation, no full business/compliance context. |
| Risk Prioritization | Exploitability + business impact + asset context + threat intelligence. | Sense → Attack → Plan: asset discovery → exploit validation → prioritized action plan. |
| False-Positive Handling | AI Validation Agents auto-retest and deduplicate findings. | Validated exposures only delivered, AI filters noise before reporting. |
| DevSecOps Integration | Deep integration with GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket, Jira, Linear, CI/CD. | No developer tooling or CI/CD integration. |
| Compliance Reporting | Auto-generates ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, NIST, GDPR, DORA, SOX reports. | No compliance framework automation. |
| Multi-Tenant / MSSP Ready | Native multi-tenant architecture for MSSPs and large enterprises. | Enterprise SOC teams; no MSSP multi-tenant architecture publicly available. |
| AI / LLM Security | Full LLM/AI red-teaming module. | No AI/LLM attack surface coverage. |
| Geographic Focus | Global, strong US commercial and MSSP market. | European-headquartered with strong EU enterprise customer base. |
| Outcome Speed | Detection → Auto-Fix → Report in minutes. | Detection → Prioritized findings → Manual remediation in days/weeks. |
| Market Positioning | AI Security Workforce, full stack, offense + defense, autonomous remediation. | EASM leader, external attack surface, AI-trained by elite hackers. |
| Ideal Users | CISOs, AppSec leads, DevSecOps engineers, MSSPs. | SOC teams, CISOs, GISOs managing complex external attack surfaces. |
Where SpartanX leads
The gaps SpartanX closes.
External attack surface only, no internal or code coverage
Full stack from source code to external perimeter
No remediation capability
Auto-PR generation with validated fixes
No DevSecOps or developer workflow integration
Native CI/CD and repo integration
No compliance framework automation
Auto-mapped reports for ISO, PCI, HIPAA, NIST, GDPR
No AI/LLM attack surface testing
Dedicated LLM red-team module
No MSSP multi-tenant architecture
Native multi-tenant platform for service providers
European-centric customer base
Strong US commercial and MSSP focus
Defense-only after finding phase
Unified Defend + Offense platform with remediation built-in
Ready to see the difference?