Retire the Questionnaire.
Trust a validated score.
Your vendor runs the adversary on its own estate and you get a validated score from 0 to 100 on your scale. Findings never cross the boundary, so you learn the risk without ever touching their data.
A spreadsheet is not evidence
Security questionnaires measure how well a vendor fills out a form. They are self-reported, out of date the day they are returned, and prove nothing about whether the vendor can actually be breached. You are trusting an attestation, not a test.
Outside-in ratings are not much better. They guess at posture from the public edge and miss the internal and identity exposure that real attacks exploit. Neither gives you a defensible, comparable measure of third-party risk.
How SpartanX validates vendor risk
Vendor runs it in place
The Vendor Management module lets each vendor run the autonomous adversary on its own estate, under its own control.
Prove real exposure
The adversary attacks and validates findings with working proofs of concept, so the result reflects what an attacker could do.
Score on your scale
You receive a validated score from 0 to 100 on a consistent scale, so vendors are finally comparable.
Keep boundaries intact
Findings never cross the boundary. You see the score and risk posture, never the vendor's underlying data.
What you get
Evidence, not attestation
Comparable across vendors
A compounding network
Retire the security questionnaire process and the outside-in ratings subscription that only guess at vendor posture.
Score your vendors by proof
Replace the questionnaire with a validated, comparable risk score.