Security Control and Assumption Validation

You bought the controls.
The question is whether they stop a real attack.

SpartanX runs real attack paths against your EDR, WAF, and defenses to prove what actually blocks, and keeps that answer current as your stack changes.

EDR and WAFReal attack pathsStays current
The problem

The assumption problem

Your stack is full of controls you assume are working. The EDR is deployed, the WAF is in blocking mode, the detection rules are written. Assumed and proven are not the same thing.

Controls drift. A policy change, a new exclusion, a tuning decision, and suddenly a path that used to be blocked is wide open. You find out during the incident, which is the worst possible time.

How it works

How control validation works

01

Run a real attack path

The adversary executes genuine attack techniques against your environment to see what your controls actually do under pressure.

02

Measure block versus bypass

It records where EDR, WAF, and detection stop the attack and where it slips through, mapped against MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

03

Chain past the gaps

Where one control is bypassed, the adversary chains forward to show the full path that failure opens up.

04

Keep the answer current

Because it runs continuously, control drift shows up as soon as it happens, not at the next annual review.

The outcome

What you get

Proof your controls work

Evidence of exactly what your EDR, WAF, and detections block, and what they miss.

Drift caught early

Always-on validation flags a control that stopped working before an attacker uses the gap.

Spend you can defend

Know which controls earn their place and where a gap needs attention.
What it ends

It ends assuming a deployed control works and discovering otherwise only during a real incident.

Techniques mapped to MITRE ATT&CK
Always on, drift caught continuously
Near-zero false positives on confirmed findings

Prove your controls

Run a real attack path and see what your defenses actually stop.